The Democratic-led House of Representatives, domination a 253 to 171 vote on September 17, easily passed landmark legislation that would bring an end to the long-standing Federal Family Education Loan Program (FFELP), the program initiated by the Higher Education Act of 1965 to offer college students federally guaranteed student loans by way of private lenders.
As the measure awaits a Senate balloting scheduled for October 15, representatives for the FFELP student loan industry along with larger Republicans understand been stepping up their irruption on the key mandates of the bill, which they say will not only cost scholars and schools the competitive pricing and choices in initiate loans offered by the private slab but will saddle taxpayers with billions of dollars in new costs.
federal Student Loans: FFELP vs. dispense Loans
Under the current FFEL program, the government can pay private FFELP lenders a subsidy for the federal student loans these creditors originate – in essence, paying a third party to act as a middleman in issuing jurisdiction student loans.
In 1992, the administration introduced a second national student mortgage program – the Federal Direct Student loan Program – which issues federal faculty loans directly to borrowers through the U.S. Department of Education, duck no third-party involvement from a bank or other FFELP lender.
Should the House-approved bill, known as the learner Aid and economic affliction Act of 2009 (SAFRA), pass the Senate besides convert law, the FFEL program will stand for dismantled further all federal apprentice loans entrust become Federal Direct loans, made directly through the federal supremacy rather than through third-party FFELP lenders and banks.
Supporters of the legislation say that the elimination of FFELP subsidies will generate $87 1000000000 force discounts to taxpayers over the eventual decade. The statement allocates $80 billion of this estimated savings to expand the federal Pell comply new wrinkle for low-income college students and to fund several other education initiatives at what supporters say is no additional cost to taxpayers.